![]() |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AGISSEZ! >>> |
Faites un don
Campagne pour des écoles sécuritaires
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On s'excuse, ce document n'est pas disponible en français. Press ReleaseApril 23, 1998Unanimous Court of Appeal RulesIncome Tax Act Definition of "Spouse" Must Be Extended to Include Same-Sex Couples for Pension PurposesThe Ontario Court of Appeal released its decision today in Rosenberg & CUPE v. Canada—a constitutional challenge to the provisions of the Income Tax Act which fail to recognize any pension plans making equal provision for those in same-sex relationships. The Court ruled unanimously that the opposite-sex definition of “spouse” in s. 252(4) of the Income Tax Act is unconstitutional and must be extended to include same-sex couples, effective immediately. A Coalition of 13 different equality-seeking groups (listed below) joined together to support the appeal, arguing that same-sex couples have a right to equal treatment under law. The Equality Coalition was represented by Counsel Gwen Brodsky and Cynthia Petersen. “This is a groundbreaking case since the Federal Government has consistently refused to allow lesbian and gay couples to be treated equally for pension purposes,” said Cynthia Petersen, co-counsel for the Equality Coalition. “In this case, the CUPE union wishes to adopt a pension plan which will accord equal pension benefits to gay and lesbian employees, such as Nancy Rosenberg. The Federal government has consistently refused to register the pension plan for Income Tax purposes, however, claiming that any pension plan which recognizes gays and lesbians equally violates the opposite-sex definition of “spouse” in the Income Tax Act.” “Today’s unanimous judgment sends the clear message that discrimination against those in same-sex relationships is not just immoral—it’s unconstitutional,” said John Fisher, Executive Director of EGALE, one of the groups involved in the Coalition. “The Court recognized that lesbians and gays contribute equally to pension plans and are entitled to share equally in their benefits. As a result of today’s judgment, the federal government will no longer be able to force employers to discriminate against their will, by withholding tax advantages from employers with equal pension plans.” For further information, please contact Counsel or Members of the Equality Coalition: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Egale Canada ©2011 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||